Check the Iraq revival Undertaking

A person of The United States government said as follow about national security.
The United States and Europe are estranged.
Probably, Europe cannot understand the United States, since Europe hasn't feel immediately danger.

It is natural.
It is because only the United States is target.
Europe is not targeting.

Its reason is simple.
The United States is incurred many enmities.

Past, the United States has caused various troubles toward the world.
The mediation of Israel Palestine dispute.
1983 Granada invasion
1989 Panama invasion
Etc
And, the United States has neglected atonement of them.

Its result is this danger of present.

And, the world is also thrown into confusion by the danger.
911 terrorism
Afghanistan war
Iraq war

The danger of present is due to various troubles, which the United States caused.

Furthermore,
The United States is going to involve the world in this danger.
Through political backing
Through staff dispatchｔ.
Through military support
Through occupation rule collaboration
Through fund support

Now, the United States require fund support under following two pretexts.
1. Share the war expenditure with Afghanistan war and Iraq war.
2. Expenses to the Iraq Revival Undertaking.

"1.Share the war expenditure with Afghanistan war and Iraq war." has following problem,
2003/9/7 President Bush made a speech like follow.
Europe, Japan and the Middle and Near East countries can make profit from victories in Afghanistan and Iraq.
They should contribute to this success.

911 terrorism and this war are due to troubles, which the United States caused.

Contribute is rightful to be denied.

Besides, Afghanistan war and Iraq war is a part of Anti-terrorism war, which the United states, propose.
That is to say sharing the war expenditure with Afghanistan war and Iraq war is sharing of the war expenditure on Anti-terrorism war,

It is not only unnecessary but also dangerous to share the war expenditure on Anti-terrorism war which the United States control,

It is because that this means to give assistance to controllers system.

Subsidiary Alliance System is a typical method of colonial policy.

Force accepting a military protects to a country, which is aimed to make colonize, with make use of military threat.
It is Subsidiary Alliance System.

To put it concretely, this method is to force accepting these three demands to the country.
(1) Expense money, which is amount of demanded.
(2) Accept station of forces in the country.
(3) Accept interfere in the domestic affairs.

Its purpose is as follow.
(1) Making of profits.
(2) Economy of cost of forces station.
(3) Pressure to protectorate.

Consequently, the protectorate is.
(1) Force is broken up.
(2) Sovereignty is lost.
(3) Independence is lost.
(4) The nation is oppressed.
(5) The nation is forced to become poor.

It is the same as being under Subsidiary Alliance System's protect to give itself completely to Yakuza.
Both of them extort money pretext of protect.
And, both of them make a prey of the ward.
It is danger.

By the way, on the pretext protect, Yakuza is the same organization as Police.
But, Police is not danger but also useful.

Why is it?

Control of existence.

It sorts out useful from danger.

Yakuza is not controlled.
Police is controlled.
Police is judged under civilian control.

System must be controlled.

A system, which lost control, hangs up.
Hang up means to take action, which is not assumed.
It causes trouble.
It is danger.

Then, under the present circumstances, it is danger to participate anti-terrorism war.

It is because; the participating nation except for the United States cannot control Anti-terrorism war.
Now, the United States arbitrarily control Anti-terrorism war.

About Anti-terrorism war.
The United States stands to protect participating nations against terrorism.
The Other side, the participating nation except for the United States stands to be protected.

To sum up, to participate Anti-terrorism war, which is arbitrarily controlled by the United States, is equal to become protectorate of the United States.

It is danger.

But, there is no doubt that Anti-terrorism war is necessary.

What is the problem of terrorism?
It is a point that a private civilian is killed and wounded.

Besides, a definition of terrorism is as follow.
Military attack to civilian

Terrorism must be withstood for the safe of civilian.
Anti-terrorism war is necessary.

Then, there are two choices as follow.
(1) Participate Anti-terrorism war, which the United States controls as before.
(2) Construct new framework of Anti-terrorism war.

Choice "(1) Participate Anti-terrorism war which the United States control as before." needs reform.

To participate Anti-terrorism war, which is controlled by the United States, is equal to become protectorate of the United States.
How should be done to avoid it?

Have a control of system.

Make Anti-terrorism war under the control of all of participating nation.

Now is a good opportunity for it, it is because break the back of Iraq war.

Fortunately, now the United States requires sharing of the war expenditure with Afghanistan war and Iraq war.
How about to talk over about framework of Anti-terrorism war in future with the United States?

However, if the United States comply with the conference.
Then, unavoidably the second option "(2) Construct new framework of Anti-terrorism war." cannot help but to be talked.

A definition of system is following.
An assembly of functions which is integrated under a consistent command, and which is designed to carry out an assumed purpose.

System already has a danger, which it takes action, which is not assumed.
For example, it is no reaction, and miss reaction, non stop action, etc.

Feedback function is needed to avoid it.

Feedback is a function to make a system to take assumed action.

Feedback is a function, which is materialized by verifying the consequence of an action of the system, and next corrects its action.
For example, there are two mechanisms, which materialize the feedback.
(1) Check & Balance
(2) Control

(1) Check & Balance
A kind of mechanism to keep system normalizes.
For the purpose of it, divide the system into several sub-systems, and make this sub-system watch and check each other.
It is Check & Balance.

(2) Control
A mechanism to reflect correction to system.
It is control.

A nation is a system to serve with infrastructure for the people.

The people are client of nation system.
They design this system based on sovereign
They select deputy, and assign this deputy to task to run this system.
They select deputy, and assign them to task to run, modify, destoroy, defence, and construct this system.
They support the persons concerned with government by tax
Then, they drive nation system
Government is substance of nation system

Infrastructure is living basis.
Infrastructure is assorted hardware and software.
Hardware
A lifeline, A transportation net, A disaster prevention equipment, etc.
Software
A public peace organ, Defense organ, The legislature, The judiciary, An administrative organ, etc.

Serve is to management the life cycle of system.
To put it concretely, it is as follow.
A construction, A maintenance, A destroy, and A defense.

When an obstacle occasioned in system.
For example it is as follow.
When a mechanism of Check & Balance is blocked.
When a control is lost.
The system hangs up.

As for a nation system, hang up often come to the surface as oppression to the people.

Blocking of Check & Balance
Lost of Control.
By the people to the nation.
These obstacles cause hang up of system.
It is misgovernment.

Next is "2. Expenses to the Iraq Revival Undertaking.

This has two problems.
(1) It is rightfully that the United States bear all expenses of Iraq Revival Fund.
(2) The plan of the Iraq Revival Undertaking is not accounted.

First, a problem of "(2) The plan of the Iraq Revival Undertaking is not accounted." is following.
There is not a system to check the Iraq Revival Undertaking.

About each Undertaking,
(a) A check of necessity of Undertaking,
(b) A check of progress of Undertaking,
(c) Corruption checks.
There is not a mechanism to assume a role of Check & Balance in the Iraq Revival Undertaking.

How becomes the Undertaking, which lack of Check & Balance?
It hangs up.
A public undertaking in Japan is a good example.

A public undertaking in Japan has a mechanism which the nation cannot check undertaking.

This mechanism is following.
First, an advisory body of the Prime Minister plans a grand design of public undertaking.
Second, the ground design is approved by a decision of the cabinet.
Last, the bureaucracy decides a concrete detail.

In short, in Japan the national diet no touch all process of public undertaking from planning to decision.

An only opportunity which the national Diet can touch public undertaking is budget discussion.
But, each undertaking is not a subject of judge in the budget discussion of the national Diet in Japan.

In brief, a public undertaking in Japan is arbitrarily controlled by administration with no check.

Still more, a public undertaking in Japan gets limitless funds.
It is debt.

A fund has a limit of revenue in a frame of budget.
But, a public undertaking in Japan got limitless fund.
It is a national debt.

(a) Administration arbitrarily controls process from planning to decision.
(b) Process from planning to decision is no check.
(c) There are limitless funds.

The result of join these three point together.
Public Undertaking hanged up.
The debt become doesn't stop.

Japan Government has continuously issued national debt.
After all, the national finance of Japan reached an impasse.

Following data are picked up from a draft of National budget in 2001.
The total of debt of nation and local government for fiscal 2001 is \666,000,000,000,000(about $6,160,000,000,000[$1=\108.08(2003/10/30/17:00)])
It is 128.5% of GDP for fiscal 2001 of Japan.
And, the total annual expenditure for fiscal 2001 is \82,652,400,000,000(about $764,000,000,000[$1=\108.08(2003/10/30/17:00)])

In a word, the Iraq Revival Undertaking is a Public Undertaking in Iraq.

Moreover, it has something in common with a public undertaking in Japan.
(a) Administration arbitrarily controls process from planning to decision.
The United States government arbitrarily controls process from planning to execution.
(b) Process from planning to decision is no check.
The sovereignty of Iraq People is striped.
Then there is no system to check the Undertaking, like a law, a National Assembly, and a Court.
(c) There are limitless funds.
After this, an income of Iraq Oil is planed to assign to the Iraq Revival Undertaking.

So then, the Iraq Revival Undertaking will fall into the same trap as the public undertaking in Japan, won't it?

In the first place, how plan is the Iraq Revival Undertaking?
What is purpose?
When is a period?
Who is a responsible person?
What is it constructed?
How hear the demand of inhabitant?
How audit undertaking?
How much is an estimated amount on earth?
What is the basis of an estimated amount?

As a general rule, make plan beforehand then make an estimate.
The Iraq Revival Undertaking is naturally rejected.
It is because; the Iraq Revival Undertaking is vague undertaking, which demands money without presentation of its plan.

Afresh, "(1) it is rightfully that the United States bear all expenses of Iraq Revival Fund."
In the first place, what is the reason, which the Iraq Revival Undertaking needed?
It is because that the United States destroyed the country of Iraq.

The United States shoulders the responsibility.
Then, it is as a matter of course to bear the all expenses of the Iraq Revival Undertaking.

The fund of the Iraq Revival Undertaking is a compensation for damage from the United States to Iraq.

So, it cannot be approved to divert Iraq oil proceeds to the Iraq Revival Undertaking.

Iraq People are a sufferer in Iraq war.
It is equal to diverting property of sufferer to compensation for this sufferer to divert Iraq oil proceeds to the Iraq Revival Undertaking.

Moreover, Iraq oil proceeds is a wallet of others.
Although any price spent money, the United States does not pay out of it's own pocket.
Iraq oil proceeds is limitless fund for the United States.

Still more, the United States comes into power of the say about the money spent for the Iraq Revival Undertaking.

Then, the United States will exploit Iraq.

In This situation which the companies of the United States contract for the Iraq Revival Undertaking, this tendency will increase.

If the diversion of Iraq oil proceeds to the Iraq Revival Undertaking is permitted, the funds of Iraq revival support will drain to the United States through the company of the United States.

Then, it means to help the United States government makes money exploit Iraq war.

This is the same as to help the United States succeed their colonial business
Then, there is danger, which the United States wants to spread this colonial business.

International Community should not allow the diversion of Iraq oil proceeds to the Iraq Revival Undertaking.
But, if the United States enforce it,
International Community will have no choice to stop to buy Iraq oil; to prevent Iraq is exploited by the United States

(1) It is rightfully that the United States bear all expenses of Iraq Revival Fund.
(2) The plan of the Iraq Revival Undertaking is not accounted.
Since these two points.
Under the present circumstance, the Iraq Revival Undertaking has no worth to discuss.

In 2003/10/24, an expense of $40,000,000,000 from International Community was decided at Iraq revival support conference.
With this, Iraq Revival Fund Expense Countries got the right to speak about the Iraq Revival Undertaking.

It is a chance to change the Iraq Revival Undertaking into an Undertaking, which has worth to talk over.

Iraq Revival Fund Expense Nations will bear the role of Check & Balance as a substitute for Iraq People who is striped their sovereign.
Then, the Iraq Revival Undertaking could get a mechanism of Check & Balance.
Check about Undertaking.
Judge about right of Undertaking
Watch for a bribery case.
Stop the problem Undertaking
Etc
And, hearing from inhabitant.
It is because; it is unreliable to entrust hearing from inhabitant to the United States.

Expense Nation is responsible to account for the precious tax spent which the Expense nation people paid.
An affairs must be avoided which the fund demand increase infinitely and which hang the Undertaking up, like a public Undertaking in Japan.

Unnecessary undertaking
An inefficiently management.
Iraq Revival Fund Expense Nation never misses them.
They will audit undertaking strictly.

Provided that if the right is violated.
For example,
When the audit is obstructed.
When the Iraq Revival Undertaking does not obey the opinion of Iraq Revival Fund Expense Nation.
Etc.
It is so sorry but may be it become difficult to expense fund.

Counter Colonial Business
http://www.geocities.co.jp/WallStreet/7659/ccb.html

***********************************************
v(^o^)v daisy Chun Jiuqien
( x ) daisy ICQ:38969410
m m=* daisy e-mail:chunjiuqien@infoseek.jp
***********************************************